Teacher's written corrective feedback on language features in students' writing

Triristina, Nensy (2018) Teacher's written corrective feedback on language features in students' writing. Masters thesis, Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya.

[img]
Preview
Text (ABSTRACT)
ABSTRACT.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (BAB 1)
CHAPTER 1.pdf

Download (85kB) | Preview
[img] Text (BAB 2)
CHAPTER 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (91kB)
[img] Text (BAB 3)
CHAPTER 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (82kB)
[img] Text (BAB 4)
CHAPTER 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (877kB)
[img]
Preview
Text (BAB 5)
CHAPTER 5.pdf

Download (52kB) | Preview
[img] Text (LAMPIRAN)
APPENDICES.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (3MB)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the type of corrective feedback used by a teacher on students’ writing. The subjects of the study were twelve students of tenth graders of a private senior high school in Ponorogo based on some set criteria. The study used qualitative method. The sources of data collected in this study were the teacher’s written corrective feedback in language features which focused on three categories of errors: subject-verb errors, words choice, and sentence structure in students’ descriptive text. The data gathered were processed by analyzing and interpreting the teacher’s written corrective feedback using Ellis’s typologies of corrective feedback (2009) namely: direct corrective feedback, indirect corrective feedback, and metalinguistic corrective feedback. The result of the study shows that the type of corrective used by MAN 2 Ponorogo teacher to correct students’ descriptive writing was typology of corrective feedback proposed by Ellis (2009). The corrective feedback used by the teacher were 108 occurrences. The occurrences of direct corrective feedbacks were 37 (40,65%) subject verb errors, 20 (21,98%) word choices, and 34 (37,37%) sentence structures, while the indirect corrective feedback were 3 (21,42%) subject verb errors, 4 (28,58%) word choices, and 7 (50%) sentence structures, and metalinguistic on subject verb errors, word choices, and sentence structures used by the teacher were only 1 (33,33%) of each. The type of corrective feedback mostly used by the teacher in revising their students’ grammatical errors is direct corrective feedback. Through direct corrective feedback, the students could understand their errors when the correct form had been offered.

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Department: ["eprint_fieldopt_department_Graduate School" not defined]
Uncontrolled Keywords: Corrective feedback, language features, direct corrective feedback, indirect corrective feedback, metaliguistic corrective feedback.
Subjects: English Education > PE English
Divisions: Graduate School > Master Program in Teaching English as a Foreign Language
Depositing User: Nensy Triristina
Date Deposited: 24 Oct 2018 09:27
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2018 09:27
URI: http://repository.wima.ac.id/id/eprint/16275

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item